Screenplays & The Lionized Work Of Analysis!

Hello folks, in between tumultuous days of COVID-19 consequences and my personal decision making, I have come up with a book review, getting perspective with new colleagues and plenty of scientific and creative engagement. To those of you familiar with not only creative writing but screenplays as well, there's a canon and a one-way ticket for all screenwriters, that is called script coverage. But let's just get into the analytical details of what exactly is happening right now in my mind and my creativity. First of all, I have come up with delightful comments related with my book review, as well as weaknesses that should be the deal of other partners. Meanwhile, I would definitely feel reluctant and thoughtful if I'd say that "the art of book reviews" is the single and most professional solution for me and my work. The Words of Emily Logan has been described as a love-addled screenplay, a work that is tender, relatable, fast-paced. The bones of this long-game love story are strong and engaging, if it is to speak from the reviewer's perspective.

 

But as it happens with most of the writers who consider their debut and first work needing plenty of organization before we have hints of whether it makes it to the movies, here comes a suggestion from Screencraft.org and a top-ranked Google result with the query "The best screenplay coverage company" that seems to be WeScreenplay, Hollywood's #1 Script Coverage Service.

The issue of writing a book addressing low budget movies, let's say 100K-150K, meaning companies all over USA and not just Hollywood, is the issue of the expertise of readers who know about universal criteria of who makes it. Additionally, being pedantic and considering working notes to be helpful in numerous categories related with the screenplay, such as Character, Plot, Structure, Dialogue, and Concept Analysis, issues of voice, qualitative scores, the analyst's bio, etc is what makes me seek low cost and the best popular service. That if it's about to be done more than once I won't get drowned by standards. Furthermore, continuous improvement and not dead-end judgements is the issue. The issue of my published work, that you can see attached in this article and of course, my current creativity since I decided to think exponentially and create more of it.

 

It's true that mere star brands showcasing at somebody's page considered as testimonials is a tricky nature addressing the extent and the dimensions of work being talked about. In any case, I hope you are curious to find out more about my projects if you just click at my Independent Author Network site I created with the homonymous business! Here it is: https://bit.ly/39chSSQ Have a great time folks!

Creative Writing Intellectual Motivation: From Cosmic Telegrams to Perspective!

Hello folks, it seems I am in the middle of reorganizing my moves in terms of creative strategy. I am finally in the delightful position to say my second screenplay has been finished. Official standards not only in Hollywood but all over the screenwriting world, suggest that scripts with a movie format should be between 90-120 big pages. My script is 108! The fast pace with which I wrote, gave me a rhythm and an argumentation on the script I did not achieve with Emily Logan. First of all, it's a screenplay portraying businesses and the entertainment industry. Those of you that have seen the movie of Zuckerberg by Aaron Sorkin, entitled The Social Network, can understand what rhythm is all about. Nevertheless I decided in the past to engage in book making and be self-published. This also means getting criticism and multiple evaluations on what I have done. But let's just take things analytically.

 

When Mario Puzo wrote the Godfather being introduced to Coppola, it was a bestseller. But when Coppola read the book he created a dossier with several hundreds of pages with what he liked, what he didn't like and what he didn't understand. The same happened with Myla Goldberg when she wrote Beeseason which was brought to the big screen with Richard Gere and Juliette Binoche. Someone who is not a writer and a spectator of the movie, just mentions the shift from one art to the other can't be identical. But writers and especially me who have both read the book and seen the movie, know there has been a lot of shrinkage, changes in the concept and deletion of lots of sophisticated descriptions. No matter how good you are, or an intellectual as the title of this article suggests, if you're interested in the big screen or just to evaluate your work, dogma is not a wise consultant. This means that all writers should shift from black or white telegrams on their work, to finding perspective and analytical thinking...

 

Which reminds me of the reality of my professors in Jacob Krueger Studio in NY, a screenwriting school, where since my creative writing education started in 2016 I was motivated to rationalize my material partly described by my professors as hyper intellectual. Dogma, is the issue here. Nevertheless, advices and evaluations by professionals that can be said to be authorities in books and entertainment are not free and be attracted by businesses with top level luxury brands at their websites' logo or down their page is a tricky nature. Right now I am so happy I have found again old folks from Jacob Krueger Studio in the internet, entitled as a Jacob Krueger Studio Writers Collective group in Facebook. A group which motivates me to create, share my work and my accomplishments. At the end of the day, I have already come up with a third script, in terms of my previous published work. This means I should not rush but rather play with my screenplay and find out more of what I can do with it. Have a great time all of you!