The 3 Different Subjects Of Movie Scripts!

 

Dear folks, there’s been enough chit chat so far around the notions that movie script attributes and a few constructed sentences in a script may simply resemble with the person and the fact that the writer is not responsible for what the characters say…! But what does this mean analytically? How does it correlate, if ever, with the quality and the talent of the writer? And how can it be revelatory in later stages, about the writer’s vision and inspiration? First of all, all movie writers have to know they’re dealing with 3 different subjects in this venture: the writer, the role/avatar and the actor! So let me here explain these ‘interesting dimensions’ analytically.

 

A.) The Writer: He/she is the most turbulent of the three when it comes to the creation of alter egos and alternate identities. He/she can be auditory, visual, kinesthetic or even an intellectual (‘digital’, here, is the title in lessons). Digital or intellectual might be rare to occur but it is an essential stage for many writers during their exploratory phase of the journey and coming up with authentic voices, voices that come from the subconscious, how to ‘brand yourself’ as a writer. The other types that deal majorly with the senses and the sense of the organic process of writers, meaning, understanding all the different components of the art of writers that have to function holistically as an organism in the script so that it can be effective, being developed progressively or all along, can enhance the cinematic aspect of things even though everything starts with the script. One of the drawbacks of being alone, as a start, in this role is the potential impossibility of the writer to think of everything, imagine of everything and make everything believable from the start.

 

 

B.) The Role: Here, the best way to deal with something primordial for the writer, at least as a beginning, is one very simple advice, “lend me your ears”. Or to use a very interesting term a producer has created in his book, “asshole proof”. Stay tuned folks, we’re not doing accuracy exercises, at least, not yet. The subject and problematic of this dimension is the entire process of looking to validate and get feedback of your script. From the very moment it occurs, we are found in the middle of the ocean trying to figure out the words, acting like a wordslinger, guessing meanings and trying to make all aspects of our language finally work, only to find out we start to lose the edge. Why’s that happening? Remember the concept all along that we’re dealing with 3 different personas, not one, neither two, make it three baby uu uu yeah. The writer has imagined an alter ego that must finally be put into a form. Then this form, the avatar, becomes an independent character and consulting seems to become a one-way ticket. Then someone you completely have no idea of, has to read your script and say yes. How the heck should we come up with such a unification? As I stated in the beginning it’s all about listening. Listening to your characters, the notes you got, your experiences, books that you may have read about all sorts of things, talking about the multilayered web of cross-checking and validating your language. Accuracy should never override the joy of creation that proves the writer is not an asshole, he just tries a lot to become one!

 

 

C.) The Actor: Perfect tuning! If we writers, have got the validation stars on the forehead, then the script is probably ready for the big or small studios and a few people, later on, will have to show their affection. Does it resonate to the actor? Is this a role he can say, hey, I want to be that person? Does it echo in his mind? Have we come up with the super-objective of the movie, meaning, what does the writer seek uber alles? Even if we have come up with such conclusions, how is the writer’s process affected and what does it mean for his script? Having dealt at least primarily with a few acting techniques such as The Stanislavski System, trying to understand the eco-system of the industry, what would they love and what wouldn’t, probably having seen dozens of movies to get inspired, be educated on art, push it to the edge only to find out where it leads will probably prove of tremendous help, but make no mistake gentlemen. You don’t have to act to write! Writers grasp language, use language, make mistakes with language, imagine language, they are being taught language, some of them they may even surpass their ‘teachers’ with language, but it’s all about being focused on the single art instead of the many. Absorbing knowledge and language can be multi-faceted but it should never prompt us with extraordinary risks.

 

At the end of the day, big imaginations created The Jack Story. Writers though, should be bold enough to create, to risk exposure, most of all to learn, but also strive for perfection and not showcase. Those of you that would like to get a sense of my work, you can find the already attached books in this article if you simply navigate at The Independent Authors Network official link. Here it is: bit.ly/39chSSQ Have a great time folks!

The Importance Of A Filmmaking Studio Mindset

Hello folks, today I will explain through my own paradigm how everyone’s thought laboratory (for each concerned case) can affect us deeply in the way we act or write. One of the very precious comments of one of my professors back then in Jacob Krueger Studio was how to be present in the moment. As a first view you may say this is the case to improve in terms of lack of focus. After all, discussions and likes both in the internet and outside is a way of declaring present… I am not interested in such presents… So let me use my creativity and writing to explain all about my next steps and how to make the most out of them, present. Creative rights from a production company include the publishing a book option, a book of the final draft, not now. First of all, can the audience of a new writer be compared with the audience and leverages of a good entertainment studio? Secondly, web leverages from a studio can tremendously help books’ profitability. I am always talking about the missing keys right now to fit Amazon’s algorithm of sales…! To the point, there can’t be more proofs right now of scaling up if there’s not a screenplay sale to an entertainment studio. But let’s just view things analytically. Based on the above I would like to explain what they mean if compared with what I said in the beginning, my thought laboratory.

Having studied and talked numerous times on digital marketing, creativity and AI, a magical world of power emerges in front of us, with plenty of perspective, plenty of future potential and plenty of promises for a curriculum vitae. So, today’s point is how exactly all the above are stuck back, frozen and sub-functioning because the creator may have a peculiar relationship with loyalty, promises and the need to make a few heads happy. I am talking about proving creative success by accepting a hypothesis exogenously defined…! This is the case for science as well, there can’t be a theory founded if we don’t accept such a hypothesis, Einstein used the speed of light for this… All of the above concepts related with web marketing and digital perspectives can be ‘simply measured’ and in order to work for newly-born writers – this doesn’t include writers who may have thousands of followers or members somewhere and can leverage social decisions – there have to be extra steps taken. For me, since I have focused not just in self-publishing but in the art of a screenplay is to focus on getting my work ready for the cinema. Fees, leverages and the production company’s audience including colleagues can play a big part in getting things done, in other words, to talk about success and results. After all, aren’t all the above issues of accurate self-evaluation, self-consciousness and self-awareness if it is to remember Goleman’s model of Emotional Intelligence in the workplace?

For everyone of us, being responsible and the sole delegate who determines our own performance is a must in the complex 21st century. If we don’t decide to step away from the conflict, to avoid it in other words, but instead of it, face it, we can all come out a lot stronger. For me, working with the best office in Hollywood can play an integral role in finding creative success. Have a great time folks!

Beyond "Rose Garden, A Second Chance"!

Hio folks, I am doing my best to feel creative and productive as far as writing is concerned, but there are key concerns with me I decided to share with you today. First of all, what you read in the title of this post is the title of my novella that I want to write in Greek. A novella about the ballerine Nefeli who visits the castle of Cinderella and meets Stephen, an astronomer with existential questions and questions of identity! Having read the trilogy of Philip Pullman and feeling delighted with his books, I decided that my fairytale fantasy should have pseudo-scientific elements to make it as interesting as possible. So, here’s where today’s storytelling begins. Inspired by the Screenplay Coverage company, WeScreenplay in Hollywood, there is key criticism that has to be evaluated. First of all, to all writers or mere article makers, there should never be confusion of the fantasy of literature with the fantasy of the mind, qualifications and power with what you put in 90-120 pages of white sheet. That kind of projection is hard, but also easy if being approached with diligence… Fantasy and science fantasy create complexity. Many times, examples being described possess universality but no objectivity, both for the writer and his characters.

What’s the issue? Focus and not giving up. What does it mean, analytically? Hollywood, including many writing coaches cannot understand the art of employing numerous magical descriptions due to lack of formal education, making all characters think they’ve reached somewhere… An example, they cannot understand an artist or a professional who just begins, employing a little bit of writing, a little bit of acting, a little bit of dancing, a little bit of singing, a little bit of everything. This is considered as conflict and giving up. The character should first focus doing one thing right, being effective and only afterwards move on to diversity. In fantasy fairytales with several fields of influence this is more than mandatory to uplevel your story from sheets to streets… It’s all about levelling up. What happens though to stories and science fiction where the characters’ profiles are somewhat advanced? What happens with those stories that deal with scientists, magical kingdoms, businessmen or multi-faceted artists? The rule is one, there are not canons or specific rules. But there are two key concerns that can make the writer improve his thought laboratory and try to make the difference, as being indirectly suggested to me from the writing offices.

Firstly, it’s not your idea, it’s not your concept, it’s not your character, it’s not your level. It’s all about focusing on the tangible plot and structure departments of the story! The art of juggling our entire cosmotheories and what God do we believe in is a Greek phenomenon and perhaps not just Greek… Abroad, things are simple. Can you do the job? Then do it! Unstructured this or that both in art and our resumes (feeling peaceful and normal with who you are) is what causes the plot hole. Second, an advice by the Greek fairytaler Alki Zei. You can talk about anything to anyone if you discover the appropriate form to pass your message. Passing it over to the screenwriting world, it means that Hollywood people are not complex. It’s just a long story. How far is too far? Up until you get to the other side! Even the most fascinating phenomenon in science has been employed with the advice, example is leadership. An example, Aurora Borealis and its colors’ game, inspired the storytelling of a city into heavens. As far as we can make tangible choices, we can also break the rules. For those of you that would like to get a taste of my work, you can read about my books into The Independent Authors Network, IAN if you just follow the link: bit.ly/39chSSQ It portrays my books already attached in here. Have a great time folks!