The Entire Education Is Theater "For Writers"...!

Hello all creatives and social networkers around the world. Today’s title implies a very important discussion, hence I will take care of presenting it so, as well! Today I will try to pose the educational, experiential as well as artistic sides of getting into the minds of characters, walking in our characters’ shoes and find out what makes them believable for writers, as well as general tips of … what actually works (you have a first taste by the title 😉)

I have been taking very analytical lessons by ScreenCraft, an organization located in Beverly Hills, California, on developing dramatic movie ideas. So, this is where the origin of the wonder “getting into the minds of characters” actually began. Did they bite the forbidden fruit? No. Did they say something they shouldn’t have said, heard something they shouldn’t have heard, did something they shouldn’t have done? It depends on the viewing angle…!
 
Those of us who have seen La La Land, would probably give everything to feel and live like its main protagonists, Sebastian & Mia, even if it deals about the joy and pain of pursuing your dreams. Today’s discussion is about the analytics all around it, not just the film but the experience of any of it. You may have seen High School Musical, or Step Up 2 The Streets, or Good Will Hunting, or Dead Poets Society or many more films independent from the genre and now many of us are writers. When we create an experience with scenes and narrative action, we ideally need first-hand experience about those scenes and actions. Ideally, we should reveal as much information as possible in our scene headings that play an organic part in the entire screenplay, it’s how we set up a story dealing basically with personal, indirect (relevant) or in our best of options, educational experiences, this actually means first-hand knowledge. Let’s find out where this leads before we draw our first conclusion. Many of us when we eventually have to explain the conflicts of character development and actually develop characters with scenes and structures, we come up with topics, ideas and analyses that we have to experience them to make them believable, how could we possibly know how the character acts and behaves? 
 
For example, in the first draft of my 3rd book that needs plenty of work, I talk about a ballerine. A ballerine by whom I feel attracted, so if I’d like to describe how she communicates, behaves and acts with her dancing students I would have to come up with relevant descriptions… Perhaps someone else would like to describe the acrobatics of Cirque Du Soleil, or if it's a musical or a film with dancers, it’s the setting of a “screenwriting story” that determines what’s necessary and what’s not. For example, the screenwriter in La La Land is not expected to come up with lyrics, he talks about music numbers but someone else will come up with writing music. Eventually though, the writer has to deal with the method, the research, the atmosphere, the imagination and the acting of the script. As well as beginners say, we have to be familiar with the material…
1.) What would my character do in this situation?
2.) What would hurt my character most?
3.) How would my character react to this conflict?
4.) How would my character shine in this situation?
 
That’s The Magical If  😉
 
Conclusions rise from the fact that to develop characters effectively we must deepen in their psychology, we must deepen in their worlds and their routines, we must deepen in their dreams and nightmares and wonders, we must deepen in their habits and tastes and we do not have such an expertise. All the above define the limits of where writing what we don’t know of stops, and we have to come up with writing on what we feel familiar with. This will give us a sense of our repertorie, but again, to make quantum leaps we need to work with concrete paradigms. 
 
In the competitive world of USA actors in America, the big names that are professionals are not mere professional actors but professional celebrities. Projects and writers have bombarded us with Hollywood’s next flair of the week relevant with an artist’s journey, musicals, melodramas, etc but like writers, both actors and writers have to get along with agents, have to market themselves, have to do public relations, have to give interviews, have to work with publishers and the internet and these movies describe the overall feeling and excitement of growing up as an artist… If we’d like to portray hunting fame in a screenplay and put an actor socialize, are we aware of public relations? Do we get the overall atmospheres of festivals and journalists surrounding them? Eventually we will come up with scenes and subtractive logic in a screenplay, but “can we”, though? If we possess the experience, it’s fine. If we don’t possess the experience, we should seek something relevant (indirect) that we possess. We should definitely count on reading books, watching movies, talking with people and the ideal is that we could be educated on these things. If La La Land deals with Mia becoming an actress, what’s the dimensionality of being an actor?
 
In ancient Greece the paths of knowledge had been parallelized with drama. The entire education was a theater according to ancient Greece. This took place for no matter what happens with our educational lives, our professional identities and our expertise, when we have to portray characters doing all the previous we eventually have to come up with our most fundamental conclusion for today that “right education” means “right theatre”…! For example, those of you that will take a look at my profile:
 
A.) Communication
B.) Conflict Management
C.) Emotional Intelligence
D.) Public Relations
E.) Marketing
F.) Writing – Screenwriting
G.) Psychology Elements
H.) Logic
I.) Career & Strategy
J.) Scaling Up
K.) Fantasy
L.) Being an entrepreneur of one’s self
 
All the previous dimensions have been part of my educational profile and are also part of an actor’s life as well…! In The Words of Emily Logan, Joel & Emily begin as student actors in high-shool and later on Joel will deal with professional drama and Emily with English literature. Developing a screenplay requires a packet of things. Do my characters portray that packet? If I’d like them to deal with personal development, it’s very easy to theorize but eventually, how can our previous dimensions help us in terms of building up their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats in their profiles? Better visualization at the end of the day for the actors, means better visualization of my profile, direct or indirect.
 
Of course, if someone writes action, or thriller or sci-fi, it’s both an actor’s educational dimensions (he will have to sell it to actors eventually) as well as education relevant with helping the genre of the script deal with the important things of its subject matter and make the script shine. Can we? Personally speaking, attending not just introductory classes on screenwriting, but the analytical art presented by ScreenCraft, made me realize my education is the other side (the real one) of an actor’s life, as a writer and by being both me and the actor who we truly are! Actors need a very strong inner life to counterbalance their fantasy life and quite often, this means being well-searched on the above fields…
 
Realizing that right education means right theater, we realize that the building blocks of a writer’s art and creative profile are the building blocks of his/her artistic materials. Someone who is keen on history will develop historical novels. Someone who likes science will engage in science fiction 😉 Someone else will produce courtroom drama because he has experience with law and justice, like in A Few Good Men, or A Time To Kill or Erin Brockovich. To come up with material we have to put ourselves in our characters shoes and find out ourselves, how the heck are we going to put them in believable situations that seem real. If someone wants to get to know a character really well, it’s the writer’s subjects and expertise that need becoming aware of it, building it as well as refining it… Have you felt that in your interactions and feedback? Quite often, it’s about people we assume to know, but we do not quite know really well after all… Have a great time folks!

On 'When Magic Truly Happens' Short Story To Film Adaptation!

Dear friends, I feel delightful to say my fairytale fantasy 'When Magic Truly Happens' is now included into a complete and signed contract of producing a 25 minutes long animated film, based on the adaptation of the short story. Collaborating with an experienced Indian writer that will create the screenplay, this means we will discuss the potentials of the story (in terms of genre, narrator's voice, plot, writing format, characters, setting) so that short story to film portrayal will be as effective as possible. Before Hollywood-nature evaluations and transformations of considering the product for the big screen it all begins with storytelling. Sooner or later I will present to you analytical details of this collaboration of mine. Stay tuned!

On Complex Characters & Their Dialogue

Hello folks, we’ve been discussing art and writing from a more existential point of view so far. Meaning, essential and elemental organic concepts about the world of scripts and writers’. One such has been character creation. So far, I’ve stated the necessity that all characters are being portrayed and displayed through their profiles and these being demographics, psychographics, education, economic background, relationships, strengths and weaknesses, goals, etc. Nevertheless, discussions being made so far relevant with many topics should include the writer’s ambition to reach closer to execution and not just an intellectual discussion. After all, it all ends up to characters in screenwriting. In pure literature for example, the majority of sheet space is devoted to advanced descriptions outside the characters’ arena so what is left for a well-developed cast is much smaller. Or maybe we should judge the script as literature and not a final draft for the movies to seek different target audiences.

But what about flat versus complex characters and their dialogue, in general? Flat is the opposite of complex. Complex characters are real and multi-layered 3D characters whereas flat characters are one-dimensional characters. Many writers as we write, we expose our knowledge and experiences and ideas as a whole and right afterwards we distribute this model to everyone, in later stages this might be wrong especially if the majority of this displaying occurs at the dialogistic level. Better examples may be understood by you in terms of earlier discussions on the unification of literature with screenwriting. When it comes to characters information delivered is not valid unless it is delivered in a physical fashion. It doesn’t matter how characters talk but the necessity of them being absorbed in specific building blocks of writing, into specific scenic spacetime with scene headings and themed activities better elaborated by analytical discussions and advanced vocabulary dependent on these specific structures…!

All I am trying to venture today is to discuss closer to execution… Still, do the above guarantee the writer’s memory on everyone? You would say there should be characters’ development not in our minds but on arguments by design. Multiple characters’ development where if so far, this meant the single distribution of the writer’s idea and the sharing of his ego multiply, now we have to come up with independent character analyses and independent creative development, where such descriptions should be bound by mentioning exact scenes where characters’ attributes are visible. With this and that, discussions judge the necessity of development not in the script but surrounding to its nature and dependent on the writers’ notes and notebooks, online or offline. Wouldn’t it be wise after all to spend more time on development and feeling successful than thinking overnight and still feel stuck eternally? Have a great time folks!

Interested to find out about the projects that started it all? Get to know my work through Amazon Author Page and my website at Independent Authors Network (IAN):
Amazon Author Page: https://amazon.com/author/makersdust
The Independent Authors Network: https://bit.ly/39chSSQ showcasing Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Kobo & Walmart as well as the diversity of some of my professional pages!

On The Real-World Implications Of Creativity!

Hello folks, creatives and social networkers! Deep character questions arise for all writers so today I would like to expand this topic from the writing arena to the real-world arena. It’s all about the real-world implications of creating by first of all looking at ourselves… Additionally, looking at ourselves suggests that characters should mime a few patterns based on how the writer sees the world, their physical profiles, their social background leading to educational background, working background, economic background, demographics, psychographics, relationships, goals, etc. Easier said than done… From the one side of things, a creator should focus on the parallel development of analysis, multiple index cards and notes after the end of the first or second draft of his script being brought for consultancy.

Nevertheless, I promised to discuss the real-world implications of the above that brings us to the terrain of a guided principle mined from the book of Stephen Covey, The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. For this reason, I will shift the excerpt of the book from the company perspective to the individuals’ perspective. Here it goes;

“What makes an individual tick, why do some become built to last (while others fall), and why do some thrive in chaos?” One of our key findings is the idea of “Preserve the Core / Stimulate Progress”; no one can become or remain truly great without a core set of principles to preserve, to build upon, to serve as an anchor, to provide guidance in the face of an ever-changing world. … Covey found a similar pattern in personal effectiveness; first build upon a strong core of principles that are not open for continuous change; at the same time, be relentless in the quest for improvement and continuous self-renewal. …

Battling the super-productive model, Covey later in his book writes;

“But is there a chance that efficiency is not the answer? Is getting more things done in less time going to make a difference – or will it just increase the pace at which I react to people and circumstances that seem to control my life?”

The daily clock, the counter, I suggest it should hit zero. Notions of developmental psychology including the rationale of this book, are very heavy to be grasped by mere reading… Individuals wonder, should I step out of it? And later come back to face the facts stronger and rejuvenated? Here, the answer for those that do not seek temporary results is no. Writers should first of all be able to distinguish the ego from the shadow, the way these things are described in the area of several mentioned archetypes that form the techniques of our model of thought. Cumulatively, there are archetypes for the ego and archetypes for the shadow presented as interdependent opposites being described below;

Ego; great mother, old wise man, animus, meaning, centrality, order, opposition, time, sacred, light, transformation

Shadow; Tyrannical father, trickster, anima, absurdity, diffusion, chaos, conjunction, eternity, profane, darkness, fixity

Every archetype of the ego is interdependent with an archetype of the shadow that could be described with two columns, the ego and the shadow. Writers now want to search and figure out the essence of bringing our work to the light of day successfully by defeating the ever-changing shadow. This could possibly mean, based on the two columns that time is not infinite and those who believe that the entire infinity and the entire eternity should be quested at this point of our lives are not welcome.

In the book I write, a fairytale fantasy novella, words couldn’t be clearer: “…where nothing is what it seems and nothing lasts forever…” But how can such a concept be visualized? By thinking collectively! That’s right folks, the ego and the shadow exist as a collectivity of things and dimensions brought to surface through a spectrum of different prime emotional needs for all individuals. These ideas including the set core which cannot be subject to continuous change constitute the notions as well, of how the fixed and the fluid, the variable parts of literature will become one fixed body of reached greatness! Meaning, that up until standards and accomplishments have been maximized, performance scores of pieces of art indicate the binary value of scripts, meaning that scores are based on what other screenplays got. Meaning, again, that judgement comes always by comparison and that we have to mime patterns and a few all-star masterpieces to reach standards. For me and my book that has been brought for evaluation at WeScreenplay, Hollywood’s #1 Script Coverage Service, this standard is La La Land with Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone. Of course, that’s the creative standard and not the dimension of distinctions 😉

Can the above mean more when it comes to how mindsets should focus their writing on getting real world reflections? Meaning, are there more than talking about the dimensionality of characters and scripts in real life? Time concerns, is one such. Creativity should not flow mechanically and it should take time. Conclusively I would like to close this script with how we, writers, should stick to our creative personas, master our alter egos and get past the hunting of other dreams. Which means self-awareness, self-confidence and disillusioned thinking! Have a great time folks!

Below you can find my work published in the world wide web:

My Amazon Author Page: https://www.amazon.com/author/makersdust
The Words of Emily Logan in Apple Books: https://apple.co/2mr75hO
When Magic Truly Happens in Apple Books: https://apple.co/3KbVbyK

Amazon & Goodreads Human-Hand Review For My Book!

Good morning folks! I feel delighted this morning as I realized immediately with the start of the day, I had received my first, human hand b...