Hio folks, I am doing my best to feel creative and productive as far as writing is concerned, but there are key concerns with me I decided to share with you today. First of all, what you read in the title of this post is the title of my novella that I want to write in Greek. A novella about the ballerine Nefeli who visits the castle of Cinderella and meets Stephen, an astronomer with existential questions and questions of identity! Having read the trilogy of Philip Pullman and feeling delighted with his books, I decided that my fairytale fantasy should have pseudo-scientific elements to make it as interesting as possible. So, here’s where today’s storytelling begins. Inspired by the Screenplay Coverage company, WeScreenplay in Hollywood, there is key criticism that has to be evaluated. First of all, to all writers or mere article makers, there should never be confusion of the fantasy of literature with the fantasy of the mind, qualifications and power with what you put in 90-120 pages of white sheet. That kind of projection is hard, but also easy if being approached with diligence… Fantasy and science fantasy create complexity. Many times, examples being described possess universality but no objectivity, both for the writer and his characters.
What’s the issue? Focus and not giving up. What does it mean, analytically? Hollywood, including many writing coaches cannot understand the art of employing numerous magical descriptions due to lack of formal education, making all characters think they’ve reached somewhere… An example, they cannot understand an artist or a professional who just begins, employing a little bit of writing, a little bit of acting, a little bit of dancing, a little bit of singing, a little bit of everything. This is considered as conflict and giving up. The character should first focus doing one thing right, being effective and only afterwards move on to diversity. In fantasy fairytales with several fields of influence this is more than mandatory to uplevel your story from sheets to streets… It’s all about levelling up. What happens though to stories and science fiction where the characters’ profiles are somewhat advanced? What happens with those stories that deal with scientists, magical kingdoms, businessmen or multi-faceted artists? The rule is one, there are not canons or specific rules. But there are two key concerns that can make the writer improve his thought laboratory and try to make the difference, as being indirectly suggested to me from the writing offices.
Firstly, it’s not your idea, it’s not your concept, it’s not your character, it’s not your level. It’s all about focusing on the tangible plot and structure departments of the story! The art of juggling our entire cosmotheories and what God do we believe in is a Greek phenomenon and perhaps not just Greek… Abroad, things are simple. Can you do the job? Then do it! Unstructured this or that both in art and our resumes (feeling peaceful and normal with who you are) is what causes the plot hole. Second, an advice by the Greek fairytaler Alki Zei. You can talk about anything to anyone if you discover the appropriate form to pass your message. Passing it over to the screenwriting world, it means that Hollywood people are not complex. It’s just a long story. How far is too far? Up until you get to the other side! Even the most fascinating phenomenon in science has been employed with the advice, example is leadership. An example, Aurora Borealis and its colors’ game, inspired the storytelling of a city into heavens. As far as we can make tangible choices, we can also break the rules. For those of you that would like to get a taste of my work, you can read about my books into The Independent Authors Network, IAN if you just follow the link: bit.ly/39chSSQ It portrays my books already attached in here. Have a great time folks!